RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce 310M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores
GeForce 310M Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+31777%
15620
GeForce 310M
49
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
2
4608
Shading Units
16
144
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.96 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
14W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N11M-GE1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
