RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+846%
15620
FirePro W6150M
1651
3DMark Time Spy
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+513%
8910
FirePro W6150M
1452
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
(216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5