RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1695MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+2160%
15620
FirePro W4190M
691
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
Opal
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)