Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (2025MHz vs 2010MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+48%
12350
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation
8294
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
64
24
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD107
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
