RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E6465
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
Radeon E6465 Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+6332%
12350
Radeon E6465
192
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Sep 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
160
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Caicos
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0