RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Quadro FX Go540
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 18 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX Go540 Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2004
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
110 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
