RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2010MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX250 Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1449%
12350
GeForce MX250
797
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
3
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
10W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GP108B
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
