RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 760A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 206% (2010MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1123%
12350
GeForce GTX 760A
1009
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2014
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
55W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
