Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 680M

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 680M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 165% (2010MHz vs 758MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +505%
12350
GeForce GTX 680M
2038

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1344
96
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net