Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 40.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+2059%
12350
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
572
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.00GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N13P-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
