RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 320M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3048 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 320M Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+23201%
12350
GeForce GT 320M
53
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
3
3072
Shading Units
24
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.80 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
23W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT216
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
