RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 9300M G
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300M G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9300M G Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+47400%
12350
GeForce 9300M G
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
13W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
