RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs FirePro M7740
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 54.14GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1384%
12350
FirePro M7740
832
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
846 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.14GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
60W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
M97
-
GPU Variant
M97XT-GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1