Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Arc A770M

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Arc A770M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2010MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Arc A770M Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12350
Arc A770M +9%
13520

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
4096
96
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
120W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net