Radeon X1650 AGP vs FirePro S9000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S9000 Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV530
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV530 X1650
(215CCCBKB12FG)
(215CCCBKB12FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
