Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1600 PRO AGP Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 50W)
Radeon Pro W6400 Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
41W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Floppy
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV530
GPU Name
Navi 24
RV530 PRO
(215CADAKA24FG)
(215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
R500
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
