Radeon X1600 PRO AGP vs P106 090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1600 PRO AGP Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 75W)
P106 090 Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jul 2017
Radeon R500 AGP
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
390 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.48GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS
Board Design
41W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
Floppy
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV530
GPU Name
GP106
RV530 PRO
(215CADAKA24FG)
(215CADAKA24FG)
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
R500
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8