Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX Vega 56 Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1471MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX Vega 56
+1668%
10540
GeForce GTX 295
596
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1156 MHz
Base Clock
-
1471 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
448bit
409.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
94.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
329.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
21.09 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.54 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
659.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 10 XL
(215-0894216)
(215-0894216)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0