Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 7900 XT Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2394MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7900 XT
+1706%
51480
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2849
Graphics Card
Nov 2022
Release Date
Jul 2020
Navi III
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1387 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2394 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
800.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
84
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
5376
Shading Units
896
336
TMUs
56
192
ROPs
32
84
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
80 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
459.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
804.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
103.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
51.48 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
1.609 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
80W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 31 XT
(215-145000156)
(215-145000156)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6