Radeon RX 6900 XT vs FirePro W7100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6900 XT Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
FirePro W7100 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6900 XT
+598%
23040
FirePro W7100
3297
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon RX 6900 XT
+740%
20764
FirePro W7100
2471
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon RX 6900 XT
+750%
10076
FirePro W7100
1185
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
80
Compute Units
28
5120
Shading Units
1792
320
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
288.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
720.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
46.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 21
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 21 XTX
(215-121000167)
(215-121000167)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
