Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5600 OEM Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 230 Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
+3996%
6390
GeForce GT 230
156
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
Navi
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1130 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
199.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
12.78 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.390 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
399.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 10
GPU Name
G94B
Navi 10 XE
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0