Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5500M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5500M Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1645MHz vs 1335MHz)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5500M
+12%
4632
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4101
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon RX 5500M
4304
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+15%
4973
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Radeon RX 5500M
2002
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+15%
2304
Blender
Radeon RX 5500M
370
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+135%
870
Graphics Card
Oct 2019
Release Date
Apr 2019
Mobility Radeon
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1375 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
22
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1408
Shading Units
1536
88
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
52.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
144.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
9.265 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
289.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
85W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 14
GPU Name
TU116
Navi 14 XTM
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.7