Radeon RX 550 640SP vs H200 SXM 141 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 550 640SP and 141GB VRAM H200 SXM 141 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 550 640SP Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 141 GB Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1980MHz vs 1071MHz)
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
16256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 550 640SP
1371
H200 SXM 141 GB
+4780%
66910
Graphics Card
Oct 2017
Release Date
Nov 2024
Polaris
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1019 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1071 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
640
Shading Units
16896
40
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
42.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
1371 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
267.6 TFLOPS
1371 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.91 TFLOPS
85.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.45 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
700W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
GH100
Baffin LE
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Hopper
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
80 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A