Radeon R9 380 vs Radeon R7 250 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 380 Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250 OEM Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 190W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380
+331%
3476
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
6
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
3.476 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.476 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
217.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
190W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Antigua
GPU Name
Oland
Antigua PRO
(215-0877000)
(215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
(215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
