Radeon R9 380 vs MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 380 Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 255W)
MTT S80 Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380
3476
MTT S80
+324%
14750
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Oct 2023
Pirate Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
3.476 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.476 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
217.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
190W
TDP
255W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Antigua
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Antigua PRO
(215-0877000)
(215-0877000)
GPU Variant
GCN 3.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
22 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
