Radeon R9 360 OEM vs Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 360 OEM Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1050MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 240 Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
+223%
1613
Radeon R7 240
499
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
85W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tobago
GPU Name
Oland
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
(215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
(215-0837015)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
