Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Radeon R7 340 OEM vs Tesla T10 16 GB

Radeon R7 340 OEM vs Tesla T10 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM Tesla T10 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 340 OEM Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Tesla T10 16 GB Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1395MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (403.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
599
Tesla T10 16 GB +1569%
9999

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Tesla Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
403.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-890-KCD-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net