Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
12864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+4302%
45260
Tesla S2050
1028
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
13312
Shading Units
448
832
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
900W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
