Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1700MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+376%
45260
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9492
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
13312
Shading Units
3072
832
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
110W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
TU104B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
