Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1700MHz vs 1569MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores
Quadro P5200 Max Q Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+463%
45260
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8033
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
13312
Shading Units
2560
832
TMUs
160
0
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
