Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro FX 4800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
13120 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 4800 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+9696%
45260
Quadro FX 4800
462
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
13312
Shading Units
192
832
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT200B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
