Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
13216 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 4600 Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+19578%
45260
Quadro FX 4600
230
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
13312
Shading Units
96
832
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
134W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
G80
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
Unknown
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
