Radeon Instinct MI250 vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI250 Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
13072 additional rendering cores
Quadro 3000M Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250
+10376%
45260
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
13312
Shading Units
240
832
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF104
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
