Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)
FireMV 2400 PCI Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Southern Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
5.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
104.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
19W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV380
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.4
OpenGL
2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
Shader Model
-
