Radeon HD 6790 vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6790 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 6790
1344
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+111%
2849
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jul 2020
Northern Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
134.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
13.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1344 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Barts
GPU Name
TU116
Barts LE
(215-0798002)
(215-0798002)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
255 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6