Radeon E9172 MXM vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon E9172 MXM Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1219MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9172 MXM
1248
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+96%
2458
Graphics Card
Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1124 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
TU117
E9170
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
