Radeon 550X vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 550X and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon 550X Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1218MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 550X
+3796%
1247
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Mar 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Polaris
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1082 MHz
Base Clock
-
1218 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
2
512
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
19.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
38.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1247 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1247 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
77.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
RV620
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
(215-0904018)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
(215-0670006)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
