Quadro P4000 vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P4000 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
RTX A2000 Embedded Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1612MHz vs 1480MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
5304
RTX A2000 Embedded
+55%
8253
Blender
Quadro P4000
549
RTX A2000 Embedded
+264%
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro P4000
88
RTX A2000 Embedded
+207%
271
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1202 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
20
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GA107S
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
314 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
