Quadro P4000 vs Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P4000 Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Quadro 410 Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
+1857%
5304
Quadro 410
271
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P4000
+3533%
4942
Quadro 410
136
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
38W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
