Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro K6000 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 239W)
Quadro K6000 SDI Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
Quadro K6000 SDI
+74%
5196
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
2880
72
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
239W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
3x SDI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
3x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
