Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro FX 5800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 189W)
Quadro FX 5800 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+378%
2974
Quadro FX 5800
622
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
30
1152
Shading Units
240
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
189W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT200B
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
