Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro FX 5600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+759%
2974
Quadro FX 5600
346
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
16
1152
Shading Units
128
72
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
171W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
