Quadro P2000 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (2100MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
13440 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
AMD Instinct MI300A
+4022%
122600
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
228
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
14592
72
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
MI300
Pascal
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
