Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro P2000 Mobile vs A10G

Quadro P2000 Mobile vs A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P2000 Mobile Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
A10G Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1710MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
A10G +959%
31520
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
A10G +1453%
3589

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
72
1152
Shading Units
9216
72
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net