Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2495MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
RTX A5500 Advantages
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 295W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
+79%
61320
RTX A5500
34100
Graphics Card
Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1855 MHz
Base Clock
1080 MHz
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
96
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
6144
Shading Units
10240
384
TMUs
320
192
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
96
RT Cores
80
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
295W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Navi 31
GPU Name
GA102
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
