Quadro K2000 vs RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 80W)
RTX A4500 Embedded Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1852%
14310
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
46
384
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7