Quadro K2000 vs GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
GRID RTX T10 16
+1264%
9999
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
384
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
