Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison P102 100 vs RTX A400

P102 100 vs RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

P102 100 Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
RTX A400 Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1762MHz vs 1683MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +298%
10770
RTX A400
2706
3DMark Time Spy
P102 100 +236%
7042
RTX A400
2091

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

25
SM Count
6
3200
Shading Units
768
200
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
0 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
GA107
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net