NVS 510 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVS 510 Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 210W)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
7488 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 510
306
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+12850%
39630
Graphics Card
Oct 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
60
192
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
210W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD103
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
