Mobility Radeon X2300 vs Radeon R7 M260X
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 M260X Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock715MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
M6x
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
715 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
64MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.272GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M64
GPU Name
Opal
M64-M
(216PVAVA12FG)
(216PVAVA12FG)
GPU Variant
Opal PRO
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
